Evaluating metadata for bias
Instructional video: Evaluating sources: Use the ACT UP test (7:52 minutes)
Part I of this two-part video introduces ACT UP, a framework for evaluating the authority, currency, truthfulness, unbiasedness, and positionality of an information source.
Note: This video is recorded on a desktop. The view will differ on a laptop, tablet, or mobile phone.
Video transcript Part I Evaluating sources: Use the ACT UP test (PDF). Download this text version to follow along.
Carleton University Library ACT UP subject guide.
Guided conversation
Part 1 Introducing the ACT UP framework for evaluating position and privilege
In your small groups, reflect on and discuss the following questions:
- How does the ACT UP test define bias and positionality?
- Link to the Library of Congress Authorities (lists of controlled vocabularies, i.e., approved names, titles, and subjects used for consistency in metadata creation).
- What do/might Berman and Stahura think about approved “controlled vocabularies”?
Share your thoughts with the larger group.
Part 2: Power Flower and privilege
Working individually, complete the Power Flower handout. Share your thoughts with a partner.
In the large group, consider and discuss the following questions:
- How might your bias and positionality influence metadata creation?
- How might you use a tool such as the power flower diagram to identify your positionality and then critically assess the tags you create?
Evaluating privilege: Power Flower
Power Flower Handout
Power Flower activity instructions